HOW TO SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE GOD DOES NOT EXIST

To conclusively establish that there is absolutely "no evidence" for a creator, or creation, and  demolish all notions of the existence of God, all you need to do is provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer to all of the following:  

1. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how the universe brought itself into existence. And where gravity and the time-space continuum came from.   

2.  Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how a dependent dying universe, that cannot prevent itself from running down towards maximum entropy and heat death, wound itself up into the initial state of "minimum" entropy (the initial state of maximum information, order and usable energy.)

3. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how the cosmological constants became so finely tuned such that even the "slightest" variation would mean that there was no universe, and no life.

4. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how the elements of the periodic table came into existence, with the specific properties, and the capacity to interact and interrelate in specific ways, to facilitate the production of various compositions of matter, and provide the basis of modern chemistry.

5. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how a universe comprising diverse phenomena, and particular components would come into existence and function as a "fully integrated" and "workable whole".   

6. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how sub-atomic particles emerged so finely balanced such that even the slightest variation would mean cosmic disaster.

7. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how natural laws would come into existence without a regulative law maker.

8. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how a universe having  mathematical regularly could come into existence without a regulative cause, or divine mathematician.

7. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how the profoundly unique water molecule brought itself into existence, such that even the slightest variation would destroy its unique properties, essential to life.

8. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how life came from lifeless matter.

9. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how mind and consciousness came from mindless non-conscious matter.

10. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how your reason came from non-reasoning matter in motion.

11. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how your intelligence came from non-intelligent matter in motion.

12. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how uncaring cosmic events, together with mindless chance mutations and blind ruthless and uncaring natural selection, would produce loving, caring, altruistic human beings.

13. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how the awareness of right and wrong, good and evil came about, if there is no such thing as good and evil in an uncaring amoral naturalistic cosmos, where everything is ultimately nothing but amoral matter in motion. .  

14. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to why natural selection would "preserve" within human genetics a "spiritual" and "religious" mindset, if nothing existed beyond merely "material matter and particles" in motion.

Particularly, as Darwinism operates on the principle that natural selection only preserves variations that are "useful" To quote Darwin, "Natural selection is scrutinizing the slightest variations, rejecting those that are bad, preserving and adding up all that are good." In short, why are there "any" theists, creationists, or "any" human religions notions at all. And why do these exist in the most complex and advanced form of 'evolved' life-form, namely humans?

 

NOW TO THE BIG PICTURE "BROADER PERSPECTIVE" ISSUES. 

Now we come to the problem of creating finely balanced Eco-systems all over the planet, and as to where mindless chance mutations and a localized natural selection process operating at an individual level would get the "overall perspective" needed to produce the Dawkins Darwinian Greatest Show on Earth. As to how this would be accomplished purely by "chance" events, and natural selection without a "Grand Master conductor" having all the capabilities and perspectives of deity.

So, here's the challenge:  

Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to where any evolutionary process, operating at a local individual level, would get the "overall perspective" needed to know "what existed in the broader environment", in order to evolve individual features to utilize existing environmental phenomena. For example:

15. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to how natural selection would know light rays actually existed in the broader environment in order to evolve light receptive features to pick light up, along with the necessary pre-existing light transmission and processing system.

16. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to where natural selection would get the necessary "overall perspective" to know that, oxygen, food, sound, smell, taste, reproductive partners, and other factors existed in the broader environment, in order to evolve, ears, taste buds, lungs, digestive, and complementary reproductive systems.

17. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to where mindless chance mutations, and "blind" natural selection would evolve different life-forms in different ways, at different rates, and at different times, to produce an "overall" fully integrated living environment of inter-dependent, and co-dependent life-forms and creatures.  Particularly, when natural selection is "blind", and has no overall perspective or predictive power. And thus wouldn't have the foggiest notion as to where anything, and everything is evolving to, or even why!  

18. Provide a "purely natural" verifiable scientific answer as to where natural selection would get the "overall perspective" needed to evolve the individual parts, comprising a vast multitude of vastly complex systems and subsystems, and assembling and integrating everything in a specific way, to serve a specific function, for a specific purpose, to produce a workable whole, as part of an overall fully integrated environment of "interrelated" life-forms.

CONCLUSION:

If you can scientifically establish that all the above happened by purely "natural process alone". You can scientifically prove there is no God. 

However, if you CAN'T produce a "purely natural" answer to all the above, than the only alternative is a "metaphysical" and "transcendent" answer OUTSIDE the cosmos, and natural world.  Meaning, a cosmic cause is both a scientific and philosophical NECESSITY.

Remember! Neither the Nobel committee, nor I, conduct real science by "unverifiable" inferences, explanations, or assumptions.  So, what is needed is real verifiable science.

Off you go!

John Heininger
www.thegodreality.com